MTA-EN-001 - Revision history

Colton Smith: Revision 0 Reviewed by Monica Hurley

2026-03-16T16:25:34Z

Revision 0 Reviewed by Monica Hurley

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{DISPLAYTITLE:Reduce Maintenance Costs Using Wireless Gauge Readers - MTA-EN-001}}
 {{MTATemplate||
 | Date | 12/15/2020
@@ Line 10: / Line 11: @@
 Guidelines for Electromagnetic Compatibility Testing of Power Plant Equipment: Revision 5 to TR-102323 (EPRI [https://www.epri.com/research/products/3002015757 3002015757])
-| Industry SME | EPRI - Nick Camilli
+| Industry SME | EPRI PRR
 Contact: NuclearPlantMod@epri.com
 | Previous Implementation | Please contact EPRI for implementation examples and contacts.
-| Implementation Enablers | Ethernet connection or wireless network infrastructure (for example, see MTA-MA-003: Implement Wireless Network Infrastructure Using a Distributed Antenna System (DAS) and MTA-MA-004: Implement Wireless Network Infrastructure Using WiFi)
+| Implementation Enablers | Ethernet connection or wireless network infrastructure (for example, see [[MTA-MA-003| MTA-MA-003]]: Implement Wireless Network Infrastructure Using a Distributed Antenna System (DAS) and [[MTA-MA-004| MTA-MA-0004]]: Implement Wireless Network Infrastructure Using WiFi)
 | Applicability | All reactor types
 All geographic regions
@@ Line 53: / Line 47: @@
 Cybersecurity: If the system is not properly segmented and implemented, potential cyber‑security deficiencies may increase vulnerability to threats. Following the cybersecurity guidance in the available reference implementation guidance will mitigate this risk.
-Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC): If EMC implications are not considered, the technology may adversely affect nearby equipment. Following the NRC EMC requirements and guidance for EMC testing in the available reference implementation guidance will mitigate this risk.
+Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC): If EMC implications are not considered, the technology may adversely affect nearby equipment. Following the US NRC EMC requirements and guidance for EMC testing in the available reference implementation guidance will mitigate this risk.

Jacob Sommer: 1 revision imported

2026-03-05T01:37:53Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:37, 5 March 2026
(No difference)

10.142.237.162: /* Risks */

2026-03-03T18:30:56Z

Risks

New page

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Reduce Maintenance Costs Using Wireless Gauge Readers - MTA-EN-001}}
{{MTATemplate||
| Date | 12/15/2020
| Functional Area Where Benefits Will Be Realized | Engineering
Operations

Maintenance
| Reference Implementation Guidance |
Configuration and Demonstration of 433-MHz Wireless Gauge Reader (EPRI [https://www.epri.com/research/products/3002012915 3002012915])

Guidelines for Electromagnetic Compatibility Testing of Power Plant Equipment: Revision 5 to TR-102323 (EPRI [https://www.epri.com/research/products/3002015757 3002015757])
| Industry SME | EPRI - Nick Camilli
Contact: NuclearPlantMod@epri.com
| Previous Implementation | Please contact EPRI for implementation examples and contacts.
| Implementation Enablers | Ethernet connection or wireless network infrastructure (for example, see MTA-MA-003: Implement Wireless Network Infrastructure Using a Distributed Antenna System (DAS) and MTA-MA-004: Implement Wireless Network Infrastructure Using WiFi)
| SWEEP Score |
* Cost – Level 3 – Implementation of wireless gauge readers, provided there is an Ethernet connection or a wireless connectivity framework already established, is less than $1 million. Costs typically range between $1,800‑2,500 per sensor depending on quantity and type.
* Savings – Level 1 – Savings are less than $1 million per year per unit. Maximum savings can be achieved by updating procedures to reduce the need for in‑person data collection and by integrating the data into a historian for tracking and trending.
* Payback – Level 2 – Payback period is greater than one year but less than five years (inclusive). This estimate is driven by the ability to integrate the data into a historian and update maintenance procedures.
* Licensing Readiness – Level 3 – This technology has already been implemented at nuclear power plants and no changes to the site license would be required. The wireless gauge readers attach to the installed gauges and read and transmit the data. If a reader fails, it can be removed and data can be read from the installed gauge.
* Technology Readiness – Level 3 – The technology is commercially available and is already in use at commercial nuclear sites. Commercially available wireless gauge readers operate at specified wireless bandwidths. Further research is required for custom wireless bandwidths.
* Implementation Proficiency – Level 2 – For full remote monitoring (wireless data transmission) of wireless gauge reader data, implementation proficiency is dependent on site‑specific experience related to wireless data infrastructure, wireless data transmission for maintenance and monitoring, cyber‑security protocols, etc.
| Applicability | All reactor types
All geographic regions
| Keywords | Gauge readers; online monitoring; condition-based monitoring; reduced maintenance costs; reduced personnel dose; wireless; operator rounds
| Business Case Analysis Cross-Reference | N/A
}}

==Description==
Nuclear power plants typically have over 100 analog gauges used to monitor parameters such as pressure, temperature, humidity, and flow. These gauges are monitored manually, which can result in unnecessary dose and errors in readings. Additionally, data are only captured when an operator physically reads the gauge and documents the result. Wireless gauge readers are battery‑operated, noninvasive devices that attach to the installed gauges, automatically read the analog data, and transmit it wirelessly. The transmitted data can then be stored in a historian for tracking and trending to support the transition from time‑based monitoring to condition‑based monitoring of equipment. This technology enables cost savings through reduction in maintenance man‑hours and personnel dose as well as increase in system monitoring capabilities with more frequent and accessible data collection.

==Benefits==
===Benefits Estimate===
Level 1 – Savings are less than $1 million per year per unit. Maximum savings can be achieved by updating procedures to reduce the need for in‑person data collection and by integrating the data into a historian for tracking and trending.
===Benefits Description===
* Reduction in man hours associated with in‑person data collection.
* Increased equipment reliability because data can be collected more frequently and in real‑time.
* Reduction in maintenance costs by supporting the transition from time‑based monitoring to condition‑based monitoring.
* Reduction in personnel dose, depending on gauge location.
* Reduction in personnel hazards due to decrease in time spent near high temperature, high energized, and hard‑to‑reach equipment.

==Costs and Schedule==
===Cost===
Level 3 – Implementation of wireless gauge readers, provided there is an Ethernet connection or a wireless connectivity framework already established, is less than $1 million. Costs typically range between $1,800‑2,500 per sensor depending on quantity and type.
===Schedule===
Less than six months. Schedule estimate is based on a previous implementation of approximately 30 wireless gauge readers for one unit. The previous implementation was for non‑seismic and non‑safety‑related applications only.
===Scope Context===
Per component

Cost and schedule estimates include purchase of the wireless gauge reader, development of the design change package, updating operational procedures and training, installation, and data management. The cost per sensor typically decreases as the quantity purchased increases. Cost estimates do not include ongoing maintenance.

==Risks==
Cybersecurity: If the system is not properly segmented and implemented, potential cyber‑security deficiencies may increase vulnerability to threats. Following the cybersecurity guidance in the available reference implementation guidance will mitigate this risk.

Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC): If EMC implications are not considered, the technology may adversely affect nearby equipment. Following the NRC EMC requirements and guidance for EMC testing in the available reference implementation guidance will mitigate this risk.