MTA-PRA-002 - Revision history

Colton Smith: Revision 0 Reviewed by Monica Hurley

2026-03-24T13:41:47Z

Revision 0 Reviewed by Monica Hurley

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 24 March 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:Extending Technical Specification Completion Times via Risk Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) - MTA-PRA-002}}		{{DISPLAYTITLE:Extending Technical Specification Completion Times via Risk Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) - MTA-PRA-002}}
			[[Modernization_Technology_Assessment\| Return to MTA Table]]
	{{MTATemplate\|\|		{{MTATemplate\|\|
	\| Date \|2/1/2025		\| Date \|2/1/2025
Line 9:		Line 10:
	* Licensing and Regulatory Affairs		* Licensing and Regulatory Affairs
	\| Reference Implementation Guidance \|		\| Reference Implementation Guidance \|
	* ~~EPRI PRA Applications Wiki,~~ https://pra-apps.epri.com~~, (~~EPRI ~~[https://www.epri.com/research/products/3002020759 3002020759~~])		* [https://pra-apps.epri.com EPRI PRA Applications Wiki]
	* Risk Informed Technical Specifications Initiative 4b, Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines, Nuclear Energy Institute, NEI 06-09, Revision 0-A, October 2012.		* Risk Informed Technical Specifications Initiative 4b, Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines, Nuclear Energy Institute, [https://www.nei.org/master-document-folder/technical-reports/nei-06-09-risk-informed-technical-specifications NEI 06-09, Revision 0-A], October 2012.
	* “Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times‑RITSTF Initiative 4b”, Technical Specifications Task Force, Joint Owners Group, TSTF‑505, Revision 2, July 2, 2018.		* “Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times‑RITSTF Initiative 4b”, Technical Specifications Task Force, Joint Owners Group, TSTF‑505, Revision 2, July 2, 2018.
	* Letter from NRC to Southern Nuclear Operating Company dated August 8, 2017, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 And 2 – Issuance Of Amendments Regarding Implementation Of Topical Report Nuclear Energy Institute NEI 06‑09, “Risk‑Informed Technical Specifications Initiative 4b, Risk‑Managed Technical Specification (RMTS) Guidelines.”		* Letter from NRC to Southern Nuclear Operating Company dated August 8, 2017, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 And 2 – Issuance Of Amendments Regarding Implementation Of Topical Report Nuclear Energy Institute [https://www.nei.org/master-document-folder/technical-reports/nei-06-09-risk-informed-technical-specifications NEI 06‑09], “Risk‑Informed Technical Specifications Initiative 4b, Risk‑Managed Technical Specification (RMTS) Guidelines.”
	* Letter from NRC to South Texas Project dated July 13, 2007, South Texas Project, Units 1 And 2 – Issuance of Amendments Re: Broad‑Scope Risk‑Informed Technical Specifications Amendments.		* Letter from NRC to South Texas Project dated July 13, 2007, South Texas Project, Units 1 And 2 – Issuance of Amendments Re: Broad‑Scope Risk‑Informed Technical Specifications Amendments.
	* An Approach for Plant‑Specific, Risk‑Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, [https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/power-reactors/rg/division-1/division-1-161 Regulatory Guide 1.177, Revision 1], May 2011.		* An Approach for Plant‑Specific, Risk‑Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, [https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/power-reactors/rg/division-1/division-1-161 Regulatory Guide 1.177, Revision 1], May 2011.
	\| Industry SME \| EPRI ~~– Doug Hance~~		\| Industry SME \| EPRI Risk and Safety Management Program
	Contact: NuclearPlantMod@epri.com		Contact: NuclearPlantMod@epri.com
	\| Previous Implementation \|		\| Previous Implementation \|
Line 21:		Line 22:
	\| Implementation Enablers \|		\| Implementation Enablers \|
	* PRA model that meets technical adequacy requirements		* PRA model that meets technical adequacy requirements
	* Licensing approval by NRC to allow implementation of the program		* Licensing approval by US NRC to allow implementation of the program
	~~\| SWEEP Score \|~~
	* Cost – Level 2 – Implementation cost is between $1 million and $5 million.
	* Savings – Level 2 – Savings are greater than $1 million per year but less than $5 million per year (inclusive).
	* Payback – Level 0 – No identified payback period because either the savings were achieved by event avoidance, or the technology or process improvement is an enabler.
	* Technical Readiness – Level 3 – The program is ready for wide operational deployment.
	* Licensing Readiness – Level 1 – Regulatory changes are required for implementation.
	* Implementation Proficiency – Level 3 – The program can be implemented by all sites.
	\| Applicability \|		\| Applicability \|
	Reactor Type: BWR, PWR		Reactor Type: BWR, PWR

	Regions: United States and others that adopt similar guidance as NEI 06-09, Rev 0A and TSTF-505, Revision 2.		Regions: United States and others that adopt similar guidance as [https://www.nei.org/master-document-folder/technical-reports/nei-06-09-risk-informed-technical-specifications NEI 06-09, Rev 0A] and TSTF-505, Revision 2.
	\| Keywords \|		\| Keywords \|
	Risk‑Informed Applications; Technical Specifications		Risk‑Informed Applications; Technical Specifications
Line 40:		Line 34:

	==Description==		==Description==
	The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Risk‑Informed Technical Specifications Task Force has addressed several generic initiatives to further risk‑inform station Technical Specifications, including Initiative 4b, entitled Risk‑Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS). The key feature of this program is the ability to calculate a flexible risk‑informed completion time (RICT) as an alternative to the allowed out‑of‑service time in current Technical Specifications.		The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Risk‑Informed Technical Specifications Task Force has addressed several generic initiatives to further risk‑inform station Technical Specifications, including Initiative 4b, entitled [https://pra-apps.epri.com/RMTS Risk‑Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS)]. The key feature of this program is the ability to calculate a flexible risk‑informed completion time (RICT) as an alternative to the allowed out‑of‑service time in current Technical Specifications.

	RMTS may allow plants to extend maintenance completion times beyond the time duration specified in the Technical Specifications, avoiding either a plant shutdown or an expedited justification for enforcement discretion. Additionally, the additional time can provide the opportunity to complete the maintenance in a more thorough manner, providing substantial operational flexibility and significant cost savings.		[https://pra-apps.epri.com/RMTS RMTS] may allow plants to extend maintenance completion times beyond the time duration specified in the Technical Specifications, avoiding either a plant shutdown or an expedited justification for enforcement discretion. Additionally, the additional time can provide the opportunity to complete the maintenance in a more thorough manner, providing substantial operational flexibility and significant cost savings.

	==Benefits==		==Benefits==
Line 49:		Line 43:

	===Benefits Description===		===Benefits Description===
	When fully implemented an RMTS program may provide the following benefits:		When fully implemented an [https://pra-apps.epri.com/RMTS RMTS] program may provide the following benefits:

	* Under a Risk‑Managed Technical Specifications program, a nuclear power plant may use its PRA to determine the safety impact of removing equipment in the plant Technical Specifications from service as the plant configuration changes over time.		* Under a [https://pra-apps.epri.com/RMTS Risk‑Managed Technical Specifications] program, a nuclear power plant may use its PRA to determine the safety impact of removing equipment in the plant Technical Specifications from service as the plant configuration changes over time.
	* Extending completion times enables maintenance to continue beyond the times specified in the Technical Specifications. Once equipment is restored to service, the action statement in the Technical Specification LCO is exited.		* Extending completion times enables maintenance to continue beyond the times specified in the Technical Specifications. Once equipment is restored to service, the action statement in the Technical Specification LCO is exited.
	* This PRA application therefore allows restoration and maintenance activities to be continued beyond the times that would normally be permitted, potentially avoiding plant shutdowns. It also allows for voluntary entry into a RICT to support planned maintenance. An added benefit is that the additional time can provide the opportunity to complete the maintenance in a more thorough manner, providing substantial operational flexibility and significant cost savings.		* This PRA application therefore allows restoration and maintenance activities to be continued beyond the times that would normally be permitted, potentially avoiding plant shutdowns. It also allows for voluntary entry into a RICT to support planned maintenance. An added benefit is that the additional time can provide the opportunity to complete the maintenance in a more thorough manner, providing substantial operational flexibility and significant cost savings.
	* For emergent equipment failure, RMTS/RICT can lower organizational stress as the option exists to enter a RICT and avoid either a plant shutdown or an expedited justification for enforcement discretion.		* For emergent equipment failure, [https://pra-apps.epri.com/RMTS RMTS]/RICT can lower organizational stress as the option exists to enter a RICT and avoid either a plant shutdown or an expedited justification for enforcement discretion.

	==Costs and Schedule==		==Costs and Schedule==
Line 68:		Line 62:
	==Risks==		==Risks==
	No unique risks beyond standard project risks associated with implementing changes at nuclear power plants.		No unique risks beyond standard project risks associated with implementing changes at nuclear power plants.

			==SWEEP Score==
			{\| class="wikitable" style="vertical-align:bottom;"
			\|-
			! Category
			! Level
			! Description
			\|-
			\| Cost
			\| 2
			\| Implementation cost is between $1 million and $5 million.
			\|-
			\| Savings
			\| 2
			\| Savings are greater than $1 million per year but less than $5 million per year (inclusive).
			\|-
			\| Payback
			\| 0
			\| No identified payback period because either the savings were achieved by event avoidance, or the technology or process improvement is an enabler.
			\|-
			\| Technical Readiness
			\| 3
			\| The program is ready for wide operational deployment.
			\|-
			\| Licensing Readiness
			\| 1
			\| Regulatory changes are required for implementation.
			\|-
			\| Implementation Proficiency
			\| 3
			\| The program can be implemented by all sites.
			\|}

Jacob Sommer: 1 revision imported

2026-03-05T01:37:56Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:37, 5 March 2026
(No difference)

10.142.237.45 at 01:08, 27 February 2026

2026-02-27T01:08:58Z

New page

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Extending Technical Specification Completion Times via Risk Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) - MTA-PRA-002}}
{{MTATemplate||
| Date |2/1/2025
| Functional Area Where Benefits Will Be Realized |
* Operations
* Maintenance
* Work Management
* Engineering
* Licensing and Regulatory Affairs
| Reference Implementation Guidance |
* EPRI PRA Applications Wiki, https://pra-apps.epri.com, (EPRI [https://www.epri.com/research/products/3002020759 3002020759])
* Risk Informed Technical Specifications Initiative 4b, Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines, Nuclear Energy Institute, NEI 06-09, Revision 0-A, October 2012.
* “Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times‑RITSTF Initiative 4b”, Technical Specifications Task Force, Joint Owners Group, TSTF‑505, Revision 2, July 2, 2018.
* Letter from NRC to Southern Nuclear Operating Company dated August 8, 2017, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 And 2 – Issuance Of Amendments Regarding Implementation Of Topical Report Nuclear Energy Institute NEI 06‑09, “Risk‑Informed Technical Specifications Initiative 4b, Risk‑Managed Technical Specification (RMTS) Guidelines.”
* Letter from NRC to South Texas Project dated July 13, 2007, South Texas Project, Units 1 And 2 – Issuance of Amendments Re: Broad‑Scope Risk‑Informed Technical Specifications Amendments.
* An Approach for Plant‑Specific, Risk‑Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, [https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/power-reactors/rg/division-1/division-1-161 Regulatory Guide 1.177, Revision 1], May 2011.
| Industry SME | EPRI – Doug Hance
Contact: NuclearPlantMod@epri.com
| Previous Implementation |
This methodology has been implemented at several nuclear plants. Please contact the EPRI SME for additional information.
| Implementation Enablers |
* PRA model that meets technical adequacy requirements
* Licensing approval by NRC to allow implementation of the program
| SWEEP Score |
* Cost – Level 2 – Implementation cost is between $1 million and $5 million.
* Savings – Level 2 – Savings are greater than $1 million per year but less than $5 million per year (inclusive).
* Payback – Level 0 – No identified payback period because either the savings were achieved by event avoidance, or the technology or process improvement is an enabler.
* Technical Readiness – Level 3 – The program is ready for wide operational deployment.
* Licensing Readiness – Level 1 – Regulatory changes are required for implementation.
* Implementation Proficiency – Level 3 – The program can be implemented by all sites.
| Applicability |
Reactor Type: BWR, PWR

Regions: United States and others that adopt similar guidance as NEI 06-09, Rev 0A and TSTF-505, Revision 2.
| Keywords |
Risk‑Informed Applications; Technical Specifications
| Business Case Analysis Cross-Reference |
N/A
}}

==Description==
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Risk‑Informed Technical Specifications Task Force has addressed several generic initiatives to further risk‑inform station Technical Specifications, including Initiative 4b, entitled Risk‑Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS). The key feature of this program is the ability to calculate a flexible risk‑informed completion time (RICT) as an alternative to the allowed out‑of‑service time in current Technical Specifications.

RMTS may allow plants to extend maintenance completion times beyond the time duration specified in the Technical Specifications, avoiding either a plant shutdown or an expedited justification for enforcement discretion. Additionally, the additional time can provide the opportunity to complete the maintenance in a more thorough manner, providing substantial operational flexibility and significant cost savings.

==Benefits==
===Benefits Estimate===
Level 2 – Savings are greater than $1 million per year but less than $5 million per year (inclusive).

===Benefits Description===
When fully implemented an RMTS program may provide the following benefits:

* Under a Risk‑Managed Technical Specifications program, a nuclear power plant may use its PRA to determine the safety impact of removing equipment in the plant Technical Specifications from service as the plant configuration changes over time.
* Extending completion times enables maintenance to continue beyond the times specified in the Technical Specifications. Once equipment is restored to service, the action statement in the Technical Specification LCO is exited.
* This PRA application therefore allows restoration and maintenance activities to be continued beyond the times that would normally be permitted, potentially avoiding plant shutdowns. It also allows for voluntary entry into a RICT to support planned maintenance. An added benefit is that the additional time can provide the opportunity to complete the maintenance in a more thorough manner, providing substantial operational flexibility and significant cost savings.
* For emergent equipment failure, RMTS/RICT can lower organizational stress as the option exists to enter a RICT and avoid either a plant shutdown or an expedited justification for enforcement discretion.

==Costs and Schedule==
===Cost===
Level 2 – Implementation cost is between $1 million and $5 million.

===Schedule===
One to three years.

===Scope Context===
Benefits and costs will depend on the scope of implementation and frequency of use. Benefit estimates above are based on industry experience and will likely occur in discrete events where shutdowns are avoided or a RICT is intentionally entered to execute particular maintenance evolutions at‑power. Cost estimates assume the plant has a reasonably mature PRA model, but may require some updates to meet the technical adequacy requirements for the program. Licensing costs are also included to gain approval for participation in the program.

==Risks==
No unique risks beyond standard project risks associated with implementing changes at nuclear power plants.